But the most important part is around back: This image sensor package lets the phone know where it is in the real world, and maps out its surroundings. That sensor system is what allows Tango apps to work. There'll be 35 apps at launch. Such as Domino World, a game that lets you place rows of virtual dominoes in your real world, then topple them over. Or Solar Simulator, which puts the size of our solar system into perspective by placing planets the proper distance from each other. Big names such as Hot Wheels are also on board.
Its biggest advantages were color, image stabilization, sharpness, contrast, low-light shooting and zoom, unsurprisingly given its second camera, The Pixel XL, which offers the identical cameras and image processing as the Pixel, did lead the iPhone 7 Plus in some areas, though, Its autofocus was faster, and it sometimes kept a nice exposure when the iPhone went overboard with brightness, Google's phone handily beat the iPhone 7 Plus when it came to slow-motion video with sharper imagery, too, When Apple debuted the first iPhone in 2007, it couldn't shoot video at all, That's unthinkable today even for a low-end phone, Good mobile video is crucial in the era of YouTube, Facebook and Snapchat, farter of the year funny quote iphone case Even if you're not into sharing, video is key to chronicling our lives, So it behooves you to pay attention to video quality..
Don't consider this a final judgment. Much of Google's approach to photography and videography involves extensive image processing, including its excellent HDR+ technology used for photos. There's no HDR+ for video, but Google still could offer camera app software updates to address some Pixel shortcomings. Here's a look at some of the details of our tests. The two phones take a very different approach to image stabilization, a critical aspect of video quality. The iPhone 7 Plus uses an optical approach that physically moves lens elements to counteract the camera motion caused by shaky hands or movement when you're walking. The Pixel XL uses digital stabilization, which uses motion sensors and image data to try to mathematically compensate for camera movement.
Each has its advantages when it comes to camera size, component costs and other farter of the year funny quote iphone case factors, but we found the iPhone's approach generally resulted in a smoother, more human feel, The Pixel XL would try hard to stabilize a shot, but when it figured out you really had pointed the camera in a new direction, there would be an abrupt stop-and-start shift to the new perspective, This made video jerky, The iPhone wasn't as good at compensating for the bobbing perspective you'll often see in videos shot while walking, but it still looked more natural..
And likely because the Pixel XL relies on its processor for stabilization, it struggled when shooting video at 60 frames per second -- double the rate of ordinary 1080p video and thus double the number of pixels to process -- or when shooting higher-resolution 4K video at 30 frames per second. Video from the Google Pixel XL, left, handled overexposure challenges with more a natural look than the Apple iPhone 7 Plus. iPhone 7 Plus videos at times were overexposed, a problem I've found in iPhone photos, too, where foreheads and cheeks in the sun are glaring white, orange or yellow. In dim conditions, details in shadowy areas often disappeared into the murk. The Pixel XL handled exposure better overall, though I preferred the iPhone 7 Plus with sunrises and sunsets that are a challenge for any camera today.
